There seems to be a renewed interest in film and I’m happy for everyone who is discovering it, rediscovering it, or enjoying it. As for me, I have no desire to shoot film again. I love the convenience and immediate feedback I get with digital and I’m not willing to give that up.
But, as I connect with more and more film photographers, I realize there is one aspect of shooting film that I’d like to recapture.
I miss the pace and deliberateness I used to have when I shot film.
Particularly, being limited to 24 or 36 photos used to slow me down and force me to put more thought into each shot.
This morning I a) wrote up a quick substack note:
I am headed out to shoot and will try the following
Shoot 36 images (no more because thats what a roll held but also no less because I’d want to get it off to the lab and not have it sit in the camera until the next shoot.
Set the ISO before the first shot and don’t change it
Turn auto white balance off
Choose a film simulation and shoot JPEGs (I usually shoot RAW with no film simulation then edit a bit when back at computer)
Try to limit editing to slight cropping (as I would have when I framed the pictures)
b) Got a great comment back from
of Street Photography:Our aim is better when we can count the arrows in our quiver.
c) Set my camera
and
d) Headed out…
Tree stencils for
and of PappasBland.So, how was it?
First, it’s definitely something I am going to try a few more times (at least).
I stuck to the idea of one roll. Well… I actually took a 37th picture—it had good potential. I thought this was fair because I remember squeezing one extra frame out of some rolls (you just had to remember not to cock the shutter with too much force after that shot).
I didn’t mess with camera settings while out. As the sun came out from the clouds I was a bit worried about white balance and ISO, but in the end, all the pictures came out fine.
And on the key question:
Yes, I thought more about each shot.
On the other hand: I still shot pretty quickly overall. I went through all 36 frames in 29 minutes—which also cut down on my exercise time.
I think, as I do this again, I will continue to try to slow down and may even limit myself to 24 frames. Maybe with a requirement to spend no less than an hour.
Have you tried any exercises like this? Any suggestions to add? Any experiences to share?
And, if you have thought about what to call this, please let me know: A one-roll walkabout? A film-like walk? 36 frame stroll?
Thanks for reading.
Warmly,
josh
Love the self-limiting exercise of the equivalent of a roll of film, whether it is 24 or 36 exposures. I am very guilty of overshooting and overloading our external hard drives. It's a lot more work to be deliberate, compose patiently and shoot each frame as if it were a precious, limited resource. Nice to see those tree stencils!!
I think this is a fantastic idea and a great way to re-establish the habit of slowing down and taking your time composing each image. What would be really nice, too, was if there was a way to set the camera so that you couldn't take more than 36 exposures until a set amount of time. 🤔 As for what to call this, I like "one-roll walkabout." It's simple, it's accurate, and it just flows off the tongue.